Emerging risks seem to be an issue for all business processes these days. It's been 20 years and counting since the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation was passed. In theory the legislative requirements outlined are still in place. Although the requirements haven't changed, time has changed and as a result, execution of the processes has most likely changed. However, it would be amiss to not recognize that the passage of time has changed our world. Think of various events such as economic change, technological evolution, the pandemic etc. These are just a few of the changes that may have impacted the manner in which we execute some of the processes outlined in the SOX legislation.
DESIGNED FOR
Anyone responsible for analyzing or interpreting nonprofit financial statements
BENEFITS
- Explain how properly designed and performed analytical procedures contribute to reducing audit risk
- Describe the required elements of an analytical test that must be documented to satisfy professional standards
- Describe the most common financial statement analytics used to interpret the financial results of a nonprofit
- Common ratios and trends to assess liquidity, operating efficiency, leverage, and more
HIGHLIGHTS
- How to leverage preliminary and substantive analytic procedures to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of financial statement audits
- The required elements of a substantive analytic procedures to address detection risk
- Tips and traps of applying an analytic approach to satisfy audit objectives
- Explaining the usefulness of analyzing diverse trends and ratios in a nonprofit environment to meet the needs of various financial statement users
- Common ratios and trends to assess liquidity, operating efficiency, leverage, and more
PREREQUISITES
None
ADVANCE PREPARATION
Familiarity with the nonprofit industry